Monthly Archives: December 2012

The Surprising Truth: Technology Is Aging in Reverse | Wired.com

In general, the older the technology, not only is it expected to last longer – but the more certainty I can attach to such a statement. Here’s the key principle: I am not saying that all technologies don’t age, only that those technologies that were prone to aging are already dead.

It is precisely because the world is getting more technological, that the old has a huge advantage over the new.

Now let’s take the idea beyond technology for a moment. If there’s something in the culture – say, a practice or a religion that you don’t understand – yet has been done for a long time – don’t call it “irrational.” And: Don’t expect the practice to discontinue.

Some things are opaque to us humans. Those things can only be revealed by time, which understands things we humans are unable to explain. But this method allows us to figure out how time and things work without quite getting inside the complexity of time’s mind. Time is scientifically equivalent to disorder, and things that gain from disorder are what this author calls “antifragile.”

via The Surprising Truth: Technology Is Aging in Reverse | Wired Opinion | Wired.com.

ANTIFRAGILITY of REPUTATION

ANTIFRAGILITY of REPUTATION: One of the benefits of the ongoing and motivated demonizing by members of the ICIHWI, the International Confederation of Empty Suits Inflicting Harm With Impunity, (finance journalists/academics, bureaucrato-risk “experts”, etc.) is that I am getting messages by readers of the sort “It looks like your book is worth reading IN SPITE of ego/style/personality/organization” which I translate as “Your book is worth reading BECAUSE of <same>…”

Cognitive dissonance works for self-perception (making someone feel he is not a fraud by demonizing messengers), but not to the outside. Transforming someone “who calls a fraud a fraud” into an “egomaniac” is certainly harmful for one’s social life (assuming people don’t know him in person), but has benefits for a book: nobody wants to read books by/have a dinner conversation with/ colorless textbookwriting nutty professors with a “well organized” discourse.

via ANTIFRAGILITY of… | Facebook.

Nassim Nicholas Taleb’s ‘Antifragile’ dares us to expect the unexpected: Book review – latimes.com

Some of Taleb’s advice is solidly practical. If you’re interested in a high-risk career such as acting, he suggests using “the barbell strategy” by pursuing acting along with another stable career, like accounting, thereby exposing yourself to maximum positive risk. In the worst-case scenario, you’re a respectable accountant engaged in the local theater scene; at best, a superstar actor who never had to starve.

In the realm of science, he applauds aimless research and the all-important happy accident, arguing that we often squash the potential of randomness because researchers study increasingly narrow fields. “Knowledge, or what is called ‘knowledge,’ in complex domains inhibits research.

“But readers will only digest these sizable granules of wisdom if they can stomach Taleb himself. His Everest-sized ego gives the book the tone of a brilliant dinner party guest off his meds.

via Nassim Nicholas Taleb’s ‘Antifragile’ dares us to expect the unexpected: Book review – latimes.com.

» Antifragile Coffee Theory

What I love about Taleb is that he is as an independent thinker as a human being can possibly be. He has no pressure to publish and his intellectual pursuits are freely chosen (this is true authenticity). He has the courage to call people charlatans, frauds, and hucksters, a quality I greatly admire. He also puts his money, both figuratively and literally, where his mouth is. Some people, not surprisingly, despise him for what they perceive to arrogance. I, however, can’t help but notice that only egomaniacs are offended by an egomaniac.

via » Antifragile Coffee Theory.

#26. A Summary of ‘Antifragile: Things That Gain from Disorder’ by Nassim Nicholas Taleb | New Books in Brief

Conclusion: Why Nassim Nicholas Taleb Would Hate This Article

I enjoyed Taleb’s book, but Taleb would not like this article. This is not because the author would resent the effort, or think that the article is a poor summary of his book—quite the contrary. The problem is with the style. There is no randomness to speak of. Not a single digression. In other words, it is very clear that the article is the result of a plan—and a detailed plan at that. By contrast, Taleb’s book jumps around all over the place, and is stock full of digressions and asides. That is, it incorporates randomness. This is not the result of poor editing (as some have suggested). Rather, I suspect that Taleb has chosen this route for both aesthetic and instrumental reasons. The author simply enjoys randomness in all its forms (as has been made clear). What’s more, I am confident that he believes that, as complex creatures (with complex minds), we respond better to ideas when they are presented with some measure of randomness. That is, ideas sink in better when they are presented in a stochastic way. I am not convinced that this is true.

via #26. A Summary of ‘Antifragile: Things That Gain from Disorder’ by Nassim Nicholas Taleb | New Books in Brief.