Category Archives: Video

Lessons from 3 episodes of fasting for ~44 hours.

Lessons from 3 episodes of fasting for ~44 hours.

Recall that the Antifragile likes stochasticity and variability (by Jensens’s Inequality), up to a point. So in order to allow myself to comment on the literature on Intermittent Fasting and modeling it mathematically (skin-in-the-game), I just completed today 3 fasts of ~44 hours each over 11 days (only water & black coffee) and I can report the following.

1) BARBELL – It is easier to fast completely than diet. The idea of life is to never have the brakes on when eating. But also when fasting, it is not a good idea to be tempted: you put yourself in a state of arousal for food by eating “a little bit”. Hunger comes and then goes away after a cup of coffee.

I would say the combination fast+good meals with no inhibition was absolutely thrilling.

2) MAIN INSIGHT- The body is effectively an information machine, food brings metabolic noise, and it thanks you for resting.Fasting is like silence after being in NYC’s Time Square. It is like not watching the news. Then food becomes more differentiated…

3) HEALTH BENEFITS – I may be subjected to placebo effect, so I can’t comment except via negativa: nothing wrong.

4) WEIGHT LOSS – beyond expectation, and in the right places, but that was not the point. I lifted weights during fasts to signal the system to avoid cannibalizing muscles, but maybe it’s a bad idea.

5) CRITICAL COMMENTS ON LITERATURE-

A- Caloric restriction may not extend life expectancy, and it is a completely different mechanism from IF (Intermittent Fasting). We are made for unsteadiness, not to be “thin”. Data shows that thin people don’t outlive slightly overweight ones. We have hints that diabetes seems more the result of hunger-deprivation than being overweight since diabetics can be cured after a long fast and weight loss and do not immediately relapse upon gaining back the weight. It takes ~ 3-6 months which hints to us the frequency of famine. So it looks like we are made for a cycle of deprivation, on which next:

B- Matching the randomness in nature, it is silly to want to inject routine into fasting. We need (say) 1 day a week, 2 days a month, …, and 1 week a year, with powerlaw frequency. My next fast will be 4 days, etc.

C- The video below has some focus on metrics like IGF shIGH, but it includes the best researchers. Valter Longo is the most rigorous and understands proteins are bad for us, see Orthodox fasts. Proteins harm our kidneys, but we recover if we ingest them-then rest, like acute-stressor-with-recovery vs. a constant-dull one.

D- Discovered that there is a huge Russian literature on fasting as it was clinical practice (21 days), discounted because it doesn’t follow modern protocols, but should be replicated.

Eat, Fast and Live Longer – Horizon from Steve Hartman on Vimeo.

via Lessons from 3 episodes of fasting for ~44… – Nassim Nicholas Taleb.

DLD14 – How Things Handle Disorder (Nassim Nicholas Taleb)

A keynote by Nassim Nicholas Taleb (Author).

Munich, January 19-21, 2014
DLD14
Over 150 speakers and 1000 attendees touched base at #dld14. “Europe’s hottest conference invitation” turned 10 and again, brought together the most influential opinion-makers, industry leaders, start-ups and digital giants to celebrate its anniversary edition! Thank you for these good times and inspirational talks.

http://dld-conference.com/videos/OR0Yp8EOe_Y

NYU’s Taleb Says Debt Raises Risk of `Catastrophe’ | Bloomberg Video

 

Nov. 14 (Bloomberg) — Nassim Nicholas Taleb, a professor at New York University and author of “The Black Swan” and “Antifragile: Things That Gain From Disorder,” talks about risks created by government debt and Federal Reserve monetary policy. He speaks with John Dawson on Bloomberg Television’s “First Up” on the sidelines of Barclays Asia Forum in Hong Kong. (Source: Bloomberg)

Commonsense ideas behind Taleb’s rhetorical flourishes | FT.com

At the national level, the system is more fragile. One tall tower is more likely to fall in a storm than a lawn of grass. This leads to Taleb’s contention that US federal debt is the most fragile of all, and should be decentralised, because default is unthinkable. Hence, “I’m kind of happy with what’s happening in the US now. We’d like the government periodically to come back with a plan, just like a corporation that has a debt addiction.”

Implementing this idea in practice without extreme volatility will be hard. But the Taleb arguments remain strong. Fragility, he insists, trumps growth. If a plane has an elevated chance of crashing, even if that chance is very small, we would give that priority over its speed or its price. So, governments should have a risk manager’s mindset, and not try to prod the economy into growing. Without a risk-averse mindset, risks will grow.

Source: FT.com

Part ll

HatTip to Dave Lull