{"id":8358,"date":"2016-03-31T23:47:10","date_gmt":"2016-04-01T06:47:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.blackswanreport.com\/blog\/?p=8358"},"modified":"2016-03-31T23:47:10","modified_gmt":"2016-04-01T06:47:10","slug":"albert-tarantola-slowthinkers-monsanto-macrobullshit-microbullshit-twitter","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.blackswanreport.com\/blog\/2016\/03\/albert-tarantola-slowthinkers-monsanto-macrobullshit-microbullshit-twitter\/","title":{"rendered":"Albert Tarantola, Slowthinkers, Monsanto, Macrobullshit, Microbullshit | Twitter"},"content":{"rendered":"

@nntaleb The late Albert Tarantola wrote the entry. His book on Inverse problem statistics is free: http:\/\/www.ipgp.fr\/~tarantola\/Files\/Professional\/Books\/index.html <\/a>\u00a0 pic.twitter.com\/DA2nb0DXt1<\/a> Permalink<\/a> 2:52 PM – 31 Mar 2016<\/p>\n

@nntaleb I discovered today that psychologists “statisticians” & other slowthinkers are not familiar Inverse Problems. http:\/\/mathworld.wolfram.com\/InverseProblem.html <\/a>\u00a0 Permalink<\/a> 2:44 PM – 31 Mar 2016<\/p>\n

@nntaleb Turns out Scientific American @sciam is a Monsanto shill! This is the worst damage to the core of scientific trust! http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/entry\/monsanto-scientific-american_us_56fc41d7e4b083f5c606a649 <\/a>\u00a0 Permalink<\/a> 11:28 AM – 31 Mar 2016<\/p>\n

@nntaleb Anyway coming up with a theorem and will let Lakens boy argue with the theorem. @deaneckles @CookieSci @JoeHilgard @lakens Permalink<\/a> 11:20 AM – 31 Mar 2016<\/p>\n

@nntaleb Things are starting to be funning with the replicating goons: The “power” of a test is a random variable. pic.twitter.com\/CDrWQh8MSB<\/a> Permalink<\/a> 10:26 AM – 31 Mar 2016<\/p>\n

@nntaleb Monsanto’s media machine comes to Washington http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/entry\/monsanto-scientific-american_us_56fc41d7e4b083f5c606a649 <\/a>\u00a0 via @HuffPostPol Permalink<\/a> 8:30 AM – 31 Mar 2016<\/p>\n

@nntaleb Bullshit https:\/\/twitter.com\/lakens\/status\/715398204494221314 <\/a>\u00a0 Permalink<\/a> 5:24 AM – 31 Mar 2016<\/p>\n

@nntaleb Another one in a Donaldo denial. https:\/\/twitter.com\/Limeylizzie\/status\/715339307574292480 <\/a>\u00a0 Permalink<\/a> 8:01 PM – 30 Mar 2016<\/p>\n

@nntaleb Daily expression of hope that Donaldo is NOT for real, just “temporary”. Yet to me Laura is top 3 jrns in the world. https:\/\/twitter.com\/lrozen\/status\/715359302567993346 <\/a>\u00a0 Permalink<\/a> 7:11 PM – 30 Mar 2016<\/p>\n

@nntaleb Ahamm te3li2 ijitne min wa2t tawil. Lani7faz turasna w aslna. https:\/\/twitter.com\/menleben\/status\/715358032411107328 <\/a>\u00a0 Permalink<\/a> 7:04 PM – 30 Mar 2016<\/p>\n

@nntaleb Ahamm shi la bilad shem nitrok el lijneh el 3arabiye, nsour mitl Malta samiyyin bass b3ad 3an el 3arab. Sh3b tene. Ne7na Aramyiyye Permalink<\/a> 6:55 PM – 30 Mar 2016<\/p>\n

@nntaleb Lishano siryoyo ma7zito d’omto d ilan r7imto Permalink<\/a> 6:43 PM – 30 Mar 2016<\/p>\n

@nntaleb Mr @lakens take your time to explain why since my eq. 1 is so trivially know why didn’t you use it in your Open Science replication project? Permalink<\/a> 2:42 PM – 30 Mar 2016<\/p>\n

@nntaleb Per measurement not per ensemble of measurements @gvpathi Permalink<\/a> 1:50 PM – 30 Mar 2016<\/p>\n

@nntaleb Mathematical results have a p=0, physics overall p< 10^-10, negative empiricism\/logic p=0, the rest are largely bullshit, prefer humanities. Permalink<\/a> 1:33 PM – 30 Mar 2016<\/p>\n

@nntaleb Latest version is here http:\/\/fooledbyrandomness.com\/pvalues.pdf <\/a>\u00a0 https:\/\/twitter.com\/nntaleb\/status\/715269562862804994 <\/a>\u00a0 Permalink<\/a> 1:11 PM – 30 Mar 2016<\/p>\n

@nntaleb P-Value paper now ~ cleared through the “was done before” trolls: we have an exact metadist and p-hacking bias. pic.twitter.com\/uc18mhd493<\/a> Permalink<\/a> 1:08 PM – 30 Mar 2016<\/p>\n

@nntaleb This paper has every single error, missing that in-sample measure of extreme events is downward biased. https:\/\/twitter.com\/carney\/status\/715258655017418754 <\/a>\u00a0 Permalink<\/a> 12:33 PM – 30 Mar 2016<\/p>\n

@chaslutz @DrFrankWilson @EconTalker I hate CAF too, but this is bad stats as @nntaleb has said: right comparison is to burglaries PREVENTED by police Permalink<\/a> 12:28 PM – 30 Mar 2016<\/p>\n

@nntaleb It is easier to macrobullshit than microbullshit: for the news ignore geopolitics & finance journos; only crime reporters know theit stuff Permalink<\/a> 10:04 AM – 30 Mar 2016<\/p>\n

@TalebBot Executive programs allow us to watch people who have never worked lecturing those who have never pondered. Permalink<\/a> 7:20 PM – 29 Mar 2016<\/p>\n

@MaxAbrahms Was the pounding the Syrian & Russian militaries handed ISIS in Palmyra a big PR stunt as described in the media? Permalink<\/a> 4:08 PM – 29 Mar 2016<\/p>\n

@nntaleb At the bottom, psychologists want to be treated as “scientists”. Alas, in my world they don’t exist. @Blacklabellogic @GordPennycook @lakens Permalink<\/a> 2:49 PM – 29 Mar 2016<\/p>\n

@nntaleb Frankly I don’t consider psychological handwaving as a source of rigorous mathematical results @GordPennycook @lakens Permalink<\/a> 1:53 PM – 29 Mar 2016<\/p>\n

@nntaleb When someone is looking for antecedents for a result, announcing “this is what I teach my undergrads” when isn’t true. @Heinonmatti @lakens Permalink<\/a> 3:09 AM – 29 Mar 2016<\/p>\n

@nntaleb Daniel Lakens, your behavior w.r.t. antecedence is silly, unscientific, & ignorant. @lakens @AndrewPGrieve Permalink<\/a> 3:00 AM – 29 Mar 2016<\/p>\n

@nntaleb Mediterraneans fast, eat no breakfast, small dinner, and walk up down hills. Diet studies aren’t rigorous. https:\/\/twitter.com\/erlesen\/status\/714577237459210240 <\/a>\u00a0 Permalink<\/a> 3:22 PM – 28 Mar 2016<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

@nntaleb The late Albert Tarantola wrote the entry. His book on Inverse problem statistics is free: http:\/\/www.ipgp.fr\/~tarantola\/Files\/Professional\/Books\/index.html \u00a0 pic.twitter.com\/DA2nb0DXt1 Permalink 2:52 PM – 31 Mar 2016 @nntaleb I discovered today that psychologists “statisticians” & other slowthinkers are not familiar Inverse Problems. http:\/\/mathworld.wolfram.com\/InverseProblem.html \u00a0 Permalink 2:44 PM – 31 Mar 2016 @nntaleb Turns out Scientific American […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[53],"tags":[1243,1245,1246,823,1244],"class_list":["post-8358","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-twitter","tag-albert-tarantola","tag-macrobullshit","tag-microbullshit","tag-monsanto","tag-slowthinkers"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.blackswanreport.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8358","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.blackswanreport.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.blackswanreport.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.blackswanreport.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.blackswanreport.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8358"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.blackswanreport.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8358\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8360,"href":"https:\/\/www.blackswanreport.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8358\/revisions\/8360"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.blackswanreport.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8358"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.blackswanreport.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8358"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.blackswanreport.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8358"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}