Tag Archives: Nassim Taleb book reviews. dave lull

Nassim N Taleb’s review of A Few Lessons from Sherlock Holmes

5.0 out of 5 stars A Guide to Both Wisdom and Sherlock Holmes, September 5, 2013

By N N Taleb “Nassim N Taleb”

This review is from: A Few Lessons from Sherlock Holmes (Kindle Edition)

We Sherlock Holmes fans, readers, and secret imitators need a map. Here it is. Peter Bevelin is one of the wisest people on the planet. He went through the books and pulled out sections from Conan Doyle’s stories that are relevant to us moderns, a guide to both wisdom and Sherlock Holmes. It makes you both wiser and eager to reread Sherlock Holmes.

via Amazon.com: N N Taleb “Nassim N Taleb”‘s review of A Few Lessons from Sherlock Holmes.
HatTip to Dave Lull

Nassim N Taleb’s review of The Science of Conjecture: Evidence and Probability before Pascal

The Science of Conjecture: Evidence and Probability before Pascal

5.0 out of 5 stars Indispensable, August 31, 2013

(Review) By N N Taleb “Nassim N Taleb”

This review is from: The Science of Conjecture: Evidence and Probability before Pascal (Paperback)

As a practitioner of probability, I’ve read many book on the subject. Most are linear combinations of other books and ideas rehashed without real understanding that the idea of probability harks back the Greek pisteuo (credibility) and pervaded classical thought. Almost all of these writers made the mistake to think that the ancients were not into probability. And most books such “Against the Gods” are not even wrong about the notion of probability: odds on coin flips are a mere footnote. If the ancients were not into computable probabilities, it was not because of theology, but because they were not into games. They dealt with complex decisions, not merely probability. And they were very sophisticated at it.

This book stands above, way above the rest: I’ve never seen a deeper exposition of the subject, as this text covers, in addition to the mathematical bases, the true philosophical origin of the notion of probability. In addition Franklin covers matters related to ethics and contract law, such as the works of the medieval thinker Pierre de Jean Olivi, that very few people discuss today.

via Amazon.com: N N Taleb “Nassim N Taleb”‘s review of The Science of Conjecture: Evidence and Pr….
HatTip to Dave Lull

Mathematics: Its Content, Methods and Meaning (Dover Books on Mathematics)

5.0 out of 5 stars The model book, May 8, 2013

By

N N Taleb “Nassim N Taleb”

This review is from: Mathematics: Its Content, Methods and Meaning (Dover Books on Mathematics) (Paperback)

There is something admirable about the school of the Russians: they are thinkers doing math, with remarkable clarity, minimal formalism, and total absence of unnecessary pedantry one finds in more modern texts (in the post Bourbaki era). This is of course surprising as one would have expected the exact opposite from the products of the communist era. Mathematicians should be using this book as a model for their own composition. You can read it and reread it. Professors should assign this in addition to modern texts, as readers can get intutions, something alas absent from modern texts.

HatTip to Dave Lull
via Amazon.com: Customer Reviews: Mathematics: Its Content, Methods and Meaning (Dover Books on Mathematics).

The Fractalist: Memoir of a Scientific Maverick: Benoit Mandelbrot

NNT reviews The Fractalist: Memoir of a Scientific Maverick
HatTip to Hristo Vassilev & Dave Lull

“I have never done anything like others”, Mandelbrot once said. And indeed these memoirs show it. He really managed to do everything on his own terms. Everything. It was not easy for him, but he end up doing it as he wanted it.

Consider his huge insight about the world around us. “Clouds are not spheres, mountains are not cones, coastlines are not circles, and bark is not smooth, nor does lightning travel in a straight line”, wrote Benoit Mandelbrot, contradicting more than 2000 years of misconceptions. Triangles, squares, and circles seem to exist in our textbooks more than reality—and we didn’t notice it. Thus was born fractal geometry, a general theory of “roughness”. Mandelbrot uncovered simple rules used by nature and men that, thanks to repetition, by smaller parts that resemble the whole, generate these seemingly complex and chaotic patterns.

Self-taught and fiercely independent, he thought in images and passed the entrance exam of the top school of mathematics without solving equations; he was both precocious and a late bloomer producing the famous “Mandelbrot set” when he was in his fifties and got tenure at Yale when he was 75. Older mathematicians have resisted his geometric and intuitive method—but the top prize in mathematics was recently given for solving one of his sub-conjectures…

via The Fractalist: Memoir of a Scientific Maverick: Benoit Mandelbrot: 9780307377357: Amazon.com: Books.